Chapter 03: High Treason

In the Line of Hell Fire
Chapter 03:
High Treason
Pervaiz Musharraf has committed numerous crimes against
Kargil issue was created to make a very popular Prime Minister very unpopular. Poor Pakistani public did not know the facts. It was Musharraf & Co. initiated this war and got very badly defeated which also resulted in numerous precious lives of Pakistani soldiers due to very ill planning. Seeing the obvious defeat and shame Musharraf requested Nawaz Sharif to intervene which he did. Instead of thanking Nawaz Sharif, Musharraf started blaming Sharif for the defeat! The Pakistani media which is under the Zionist control by and large and which thrives on poor people money in the form of so called Government and Big corporate advertisement did not tell the truth. The graph of Nawaz Sharif went down. The CIA antennas were in the air and when it knew that there would be little support for Nawaz Sharif, plane hijack drama was carried out by raising false conflict between Nawaz Sharif and Musharraf on the issue of Tariq Pervaiz (TP), a cousin of Mr. Nadir Pervaiz. Nawaz Sharif was siding with Nadir Pervaiz on suggestions of Mr. Mushahid Hussain and Saeed Mehdi without realizing that these men were behind coup against him. Mr. Musharraf still had very cordial relations with Mr. Nadir Pervaiz and had attended the marriage ceremony of Nadir’s son. Musharraf’s own book is an open testimony against himself in which he admits that he had told that he would not tolerate his removal from the post! Instead of going to the court for any injustice done to him, Musharraf decided to break the constitution and military service rules and make entire
“Who broke the constitution?
President Musharraf in his book ‘In the line of fire’ has provided the answer to people who say Mian Nawaz Sharif could have just retired Gen Musharraf without taking any drastic measures. Chapter 13, page 110 says “I had already conveyed an indirect warning to the Prime Minister through several intermediaries that I am no Jahangir Karamat. My predecessor had retired quietly and I did not want the Prime Minister to think he could violate the constitution so easily again”. What is being said here is that the removal of the COAS had been and would again be a violation of the constitution.
That is nonsense. The Prime Minister is well within his constitutional right removing any government servant from a tenured post. What could a Prime Minster do in face of this unvarnished ultimatum to his constitutional powers? Actually it was General Musharraf who was acting unconstitutionally by openly campaigning for an in-house change in the parliament. -KHURSHID ANWER, Lahore Cantt., via e-mail, September 30. (Dawn)
Let us clear here that Jahangir Karamat is a die hard Qadyani and had been illegally appointed as the Chief of army. He had committed gross corruption in tank purchase deal with
The way Musharraf overthrew an elected Government, the way he became Chief Executive and then President etc. were all illegal and amounts to High Treason.
Please let me quote here Constitution of Pakistan:
5.
(1)
Loyalty to the State is the basic duty of every citizen.
(2)
Obedience to the Constitution and law is the [4] [inviolable] obligation of every citizen wherever he may be and of every other person for the time being within
6.
(1)
Any person who abrogates or attempts or conspires to abrogate, subverts or attempts or conspires to subvert the Constitution by use of force or show of force or by other unconstitutional means shall be guilty of high treason.
(2)
Any person aiding or abetting the acts mentioned in clause (1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.
(3)
[5] [Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] shall by law provide for the punishment of persons found guilty of high treason.
9.
No person shall be deprived of life or liberty save in accordance with law.
10.
(1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest, nor shall he be denied the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.
(2) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before a magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest, excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the nearest magistrate, and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.
31.
(1) Steps shall be taken to enable the Muslims of Pakistan, individually and collectively, to order their lives in accordance with the fundamental principles and basic concepts of Islam and to provide facilities whereby they may be enabled to understand the meaning of life according to the Holy Quran and Sunnah.
(2) The state shall endeavor, as respects the Muslims of Pakistan, :
(a) to make the teaching of the Holy Quran and Islamiat compulsory, to encourage and facilitate the learning of Arabic language and to secure correct and exact printing and publishing of the Holy Quran;
(b) to promote unity and the observance of the Islamic moral standards; and
Musharraf is obviously trying his best to do exactly the opposite as well as to support the enemies of Islam against good Muslims and Islamic values. He is thus rapidly moving in the direction of Hell Fire. Let me quote from the Holly Quran about such people:
I seek refuge of Allah from the Satan, the cursed one.
With Allah’s Name, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate
“The guilty will be known by their marks, and will be taken by the forelocks and the feet.
Which is it, of powers of your Lord, which you will deny?
This is hell, which the guilty deny,
They go circling round between it and fierce, boiling water
Which is it, of powers of your Lord, which you will deny?”
(41-45: 55, Quran)
Musharraf has tried desperately legitimizing his rule and uniform. Mr. Najam Sethi Editor, Daily Times (
In other words, the Opposition be damned since the government can rely on its own headcount. Smart, indeed. But what about Article 244 under which every member of the military has to take oath as set out in the Third Schedule to “uphold the Constitution” and not engage in any political activities?
Surely, General Musharraf also took the same oath. There is no doubt that the office of the President is a political office: the President is elected through a political process and his functions are all political.
Legally speaking, the government cannot use the peripheral Constitutional ruse of 63 (1) (d) to subvert the substantive article that governs the conduct of every member of the military.”
“Yet, this whole exercise is not about legalities, as we have mentioned. The very act of making a coup subverts the Constitution. But when the apex court in the realm chooses to give it a legal cover on the basis of necessity, in other words accepting that force, having made law subservient to it, has acquired its own legality, the system’s harmony is jeopardized.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court being the highest organ of the judiciary is the ultimate battleground for a legal battle. The political parties and the politicians have repeatedly lost the legal battle there. Resultantly, the system has added so many layers of contradictions that recourse to legality has almost become a sham. This is the corollary of the original sin and the response to it by the courts.”
Musharraf’s action against Judiciary!
Mr. Musharraf has caused the greatest contempt of the court. He forced several honest judges illegally from their posts. He put military vehicles and blocked the gate of the house of Chief Justice Saeeduz Zaman Siddiqui as he and several of his colleagues did not take oath on Musharraf’s constitution which was in clear violation of the Constitution of Pakistan. These great judges who will be always respected and honored in the history of
Even fair and honest Americans have recognized the drama of Musharraf and had compared his acts with those of Mr. Bush. Please read the following reference from foreign sources: “In this sense, there is no difference between the acts of George Bush and Pervaiz Musharraf. Both pre-empted their actions and both of their actions were illegal and no matter, what the end result, the illegality of those actions cannot be denied. Musharraf acted illegally, when he staged the coup d' etat in 1999 and regardless of this good intention and all the good he has done since then, the prima facie act of the coup was illegal and nothing will change that. It makes no sense to suggest that one must break the law in order to uphold it and protect it. Just like it makes no sense to destroy the village in order to safe it. In the end, the law is broken and the village is destroyed.”
Mr. Musharraf’s actions and words are clearly in total violation of the constitution of

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home