Chapter 14: The Real Terrorists

In the Line of Hell Fire

Chapter 14: The Real Terrorists

THE REAL TERRORISTS

Islam by meaning and practice is Peace and of course peace is opposite and antonym to terrorism. Islam cares for the inner feelings as well and protects persons even in their absence. It does not allow back biting, false allegations and abusive language. Jihad and Qitaal are 180 degree opposite to terrorism. While terrorism attacks innocent people Jihad and Qitaal aims at only tyrants who are killing innocent people. These tyrants have made servants of Allah their own servants and through tricks have sucked their blood and honor. So we must not be shy of Jihad or Qitaal. It is the terrorists who are giving wrong names and definition to Jihad and Qitaal. The armies of Jihad and Qitaal are like white blood cells and immune system of body. If these get weaker one will see a lot of diseases all over. The Terrorists are like AIDS viruses and cancer cells. They aim at weakening Jihad and Qitaal for their survival and their continuous abuse and exploitation of poor and weak. Who are prime examples of today’s terrorists? Well these include Bush, Sharon’s successors, Blair, Puttin,. Who are the biggest supporters of these terrorists? Well these include Musharraf, Aga Khan, Shaukat Aziz, Altaf Hussain etc and almost all heads of Muslim countries and all members of Free Masons, Rotary Club, Lion's clubs etc. etc. In addition UNO, World Bank, IMF, Paris Club etc, CNN, BBC etc are also strong helpers and supporters of terrorism throughout the world. While terrorism is like the dragger of a Thief and Dakko, the Jihad is the merciful knife of a caring surgeon as defined by great scholar of Islam Syed Abul A’ala Maudoodi. Here I reproduce an excellent article by an excellent brother who has left us about a year ago.

“Violence in Islam? Supplement

By M. Amir Ali, Ph.D.

“Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loves not aggressors.” Al-Qur’an 2:190

“And those who, when great wrong is done to them, defend themselves.” Al-Qur’an 42:39

Two parts of the article, “Violence in Islam?” have already been circulated. After their circulation, the author realized some deficiencies. This supplement compensates for those deficiencies. By necessity a few paragraphs from previously circulated parts had to be repeated.

Qur’an verse 9:29.

“Those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day – even though they were given the scriptures, and who do not hold as unlawful that which Allah and His Messenger have declared to be unlawful, and who do not follow the true religion (Deen Al-Haque) – fight against them until they pay tribute (Al-Jizyah, protection tax or exemption tax) out of their hands and are utterly subdued.”

This verse (9:29) is also a part of the revelation 9:1-37 and it has the same background as 9:5, which has already been discussed in part I. However, in this verse there is inclusion of the “people of the Book” meaning the Christians and the Jews who were also living under the rule established by the Prophet Muhammad. Superficially, it appears that this verse disregards an earlier revealed verse 2:256 (discussed below) ordering that there is no compulsion in Islam. The reader has no other choice but to ask, if the verse 2:256 has been abrogated by the verse 9:29, if not, interpretation of this verse will not allow forcing people to accept Islam or be killed. All Islamic scholars agree that 9:29 is not an abrogating verse and 2:256 stands valid. By the time 9:29 was revealed Zakat on all Muslims had become obligatory for those who had enough wealth to levy this “wealth purifying tax”. Zakat may be translated as wealth purifying tax or growth tax because the payment of Zakat makes wealth grow. Muslims were already paying Zakat, in addition to Sadaqa (charity) and Infaq (required donations), for various causes but there was no such tax on non-Muslims. The verse 9:29 makes tax obligatory upon all non-Muslims except the clergy, very old and poor without adequate income. In fact, the very poor and very old began receiving maintenance money from the general welfare fund of the Muslim treasury by the orders of the Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab.

Verse 9:29 requires non-Muslim population of the Muslim-run state to either accept Islam or pay Jizyah or fight till death. The fourth option, given without saying, is to migrate to another land. Jizyah was a tax much lower than the Zakat paid by the Muslims and its payment gave non-Muslims equal citizenship rights with the Muslims besides exempting them from military service. This is the reason Jizyah has been translated as protection tax (giving full citizenship rights except becoming head of the state) and exemption tax (giving exemption from military service which was not given to the Muslims). Payment of Jizyah is a symbol of accepting to live under Islamic law; this is what it means to be subdued. This is the same as the taxes all Americans have to pay.

A non-Muslim cannot become head of the Islamic state because Islamic state is an ideological state and a person who does not believe in the Islamic ideology has no right to head it. An analogy is the U.S., which is ideologically a capitalist state; naturally, a communists or an Islamist will not be allowed to head it.

No Compulsion or Coercion 2:256. The Qur’an verses are clear in commanding the believers that there is no coercion or compulsion in Islam to convert. The history of 14 centuries is the proof that Muslims had no systematic compulsion to convert people to Islam. One verse translation is given below:

“(256) There is no coercion or compulsion in the Deen (religion, way of life). The right way now stands clearly distinguished from the wrong. Hence he who rejects the evil ones (Taghut, non-god power acting as god) and believes in Allah has indeed taken hold of the firm, unbreakable handle, and Allah (Whom he has held for support) is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.” The Qur’an 2:256

Muslims have honored this commandment and they have been careful in not forcing people to convert to Islam. The best examples are Spain, India, East Europe where Muslims entered with armies and conquered them yet these countries remained non-Muslim majority. On the other hand, in Sub-Sahara Africa, Indonesia and Malaysia where Islamic armies never entered, these countries became Muslim majority countries. In our time in the 21^st century, no Muslim army has entered in North America or Europe yet millions of people are converting to Islam by their own will.

It is obvious that Allah condemns aggression totally and condemns any war in pursuit of worldly reasons. Whereas Allah approves and motivates a war of defense and to protect the weak who are persecuted and oppressed. In this early 21^st century there are hundreds of millions of Muslims who are oppressed and persecuted by the West and its agents as rulers of the Third World countries.

Good Relations with Non-Muslims: The Qur’an teaches maintaining friendly and cordial relations with non-Muslims who show similar inclinations and show no hostility towards Muslims. The following verses are noteworthy:

“(8) Allah forbids you not those who warred not against you on account of religion (Al-Deen) and drove you not out from your homes that you should show them kindness and deal justly with them. Lo! Allah loves the just dealers.” (9) Allah forbids you only those who warred against you on account of religion (Al-Deen) and have driven you out from your homes and helped to drive you out, that you make friends of them. Whosoever makes friends of them such are wrong- doers.” The Qur’an 60:8-9

The verses 60:8-9 were revealed in the background of the pagans of Makkah who had driven out the Prophet and his companions and they took refuge in Madinah. Similar things were happening to many new Muslims who were being evicted by their own people on account of their new faith.

Should the Muslims trust pagans of the West? I think NOT! Pay heed to the Qur’an’s warning. Personally, I have no problem making friends, sympathizing with my neighbors and colleagues, having dinner with them, going on a picnic or camping with them. I have met a lot of very decent Christians and Jews and they are worthy of friendship and trust. The verse of the Qur’an 5:51 is not talking about friendship at a personal level but signing pacts at the national level. The experience of the Muslim countries during the last 90 years shows that the pagan secular nations of Jewish and Christian background are not worthy of trust. These nations will not miss any opportunity of betrayal for destroying Islam and Muslims.

The Sanctity of Life in the Qur’an. The critics of Islam never mention the Qur’an verses dealing with the sanctity of life. See the Qur’an verses 6:151, 17:33, 25:68 and 5:32 in favor of the sanctify of life and taking life as one of the greatest sins after Shirk (associating partners with Allah) irrespective of race, color, national origin, religion or gender.

I have discussed all the Qur’an verses about armed struggle against the enemies of Islam, but if there are other attacks forward them to me to address them and write responses. Please forward your comments and questions to amirali@ilaam.net. This article is posted on www.iiie.net and author’s own personal website www.ilaam.net.

Conclusion. War in Islam was permitted to the Prophet Muhammad only after fifteen years of trying to live in peace against all aggression. Only when anti-Islam forces decided to totally annihilate Islam, were the Muslims permitted to fight back. The situation remains the same even in our time at the beginning of the 21^st century CE. Over 50 years ago Muslims have been living as colonial subjects of the West for over two centuries. As they are coming out of the submissive posture of colonial days and desire to live according to Islamic principles, the West, led by the U.S., is trying to re-impose its hegemony over the Muslim world. The Muslims are left with no choice but fight back. The West must learn to let the Muslim world resolve her problems her own way rather than imposing her hegemony over the Muslims through puppets like Pervez Musharraf, Hosni Mubarak, Abdullah II of Jordan, Qaddafi and other disposable toilet paper like them.

Question is asked if Islam is so peaceful then why the violence by the Muslims? Is it not that the Qur’an is inspiring them to violence? Please note that an explanation of the psyche of some Muslims is not justification; therefore, following explanation should not be considered as justification. In the absence of an Islamic government, which is prevented from establishment under the pressure of the West, led by the U.S., some Muslims feel that they are free to take the law into their own hands. If there were an Islamic government establishing peace, justice and equity, any violent activity would be declared “terrorism” under the verse 5:33-34, discussed previously, and a majority of the Muslims would agree for apprehending such miscreants. In the present situation of Western anti-Islam hegemony, an overwhelming majority of the Muslims are supporting violence against the aggressors and their puppets and this violence is expected to increase until the West gets out of the Muslim lands. Naturally the bombings of Churches and Synagogues have nothing to do with religious intolerance but it is political because Muslim activist perceive that every Westerner is an spy and these “places of worship” are their hiding places under the cover of religion just as mosques in Iraq are likewise suspected of by the U.S, forces and being bombed. Some mosques are considered to be the hiding places of the Muslim puppets of the West and being bombed. Even Western journalists are considered to be the covert operators of the Western governments and not safe from such attacks. The conclusion is that all the violence by the Muslim activists is political not religious. This is no different from FBI invading mosques in the U.S., arresting Muslims and sending them to black holes without any legal recourse. There are thousands of Muslims around the world being held in the black holes by the U.S. government without any legal recourse. This violated universal principle that the accused is innocent until proven guilty but for the Muslims it has been reversed, a Muslim arrested by the U.S. is guilty of “crime” unknown to the arrested person or his relatives or friends until he proves himself innocent of unknown charges. He is not even allowed to have an attorney. This is the system of injustice invented by the “Secular” Americans yet the U.S. wants the Muslims to love this kind of Secularism!

Finally, I conclude this article with the following admonition of Allah in the Qur’an:

“O you who (claim to) believe! Be steadfast witnesses for Allah in equity, and let not hatred of any people seduce you that you deal not justly. Deal justly, that is nearer to your duty (to Allah). Observe your duty to Allah. Surely Allah is well aware of what you do.” The Qur’an 5:8. “

It was 11^th July, 1995 when Serbian Trucks entered Srebrenica, Bosnia and killed over 7000 un-armed boys and men. Earlier UNO has promised to defend the people of Srebrenica in return for their deposit of arms with the UNO. Once these men were un-armed UN let Serbian loose on these defenseless people. I vividly remember how Western media used to show the maps of these so called heavens. Of course these heavens were created to turn into hell. Still non one is punished for killing of 7000 civilians. The next hearing has been set for 2008! Of course this is not terrorism and UNO is not a terrorist organization just like Sharon who killed on 16^th September 1982 3000 un-armed women and girls in Shatilla and Sabira camps. Sharon is regarded a brave soldier and a great leader in an interview to deer Spiegel (a German newspaper), by none other than Musharraf.

Similarly there are many serious questions regarding London Bomb Blasts. These include:

1) Why the blasts were carried out in the densely populated Muslim areas

2) The Blasts were carried out on a day when there was security rehearsal with all cameras in place. Who knows that this was a set up to take photographs of some innocent Muslims and/or some of them may be working for British MI 5 etc. and they were doing acting in this rehearsal while the secret agencies used their pictures to show the public these photographs as those of real terrorists. This is not surprising as BBC had shown a football victory celebration in some Arab country as if Muslims are celebrating attack on World Trade Center.

3) A strong connection with Israel is suspected as its minister along with his team was in a hotel in London and did not attend the meeting which he was supposed to attend. This is in line with Sharon’s cancellation of his speech as Keynote Speaker in New York on 9/11. It should also be noted that ex Israeli Prime Minister Yahuda Barrak was sitting in the BBC studios on 9/11 and after two minutes of the news of airplane hit, he started attacks on all Muslims for 9/11!

4) Why the identity of the most of the victims (Muslims ) is kept secret

5) Why CIA, FBI, British intelligence agencies are not able to trace the source of e-mailers of so called Al-Qaeeda wal Jihad etc.

Mutahida Qumi Movement (MQM) is one of the most notorious organizations of the world with full backing of Tr. Blair and Tr. Bush (Tr.= Terrorist) which usually presents itself the most innocent and deprived one. MQM has created a culture of Bhatta and indiscriminate as well as discriminate killings of innocent and particularly Islamic people in Pakistan. Tr. Altaf Hussain visited India and spoke at length all kinds of nonsense in India against Pakistan. His MQM lost the last city elections in Karachi very badly but Ter. Musharraf allowed them to take away the ballot boxes and change the entire results thus re-gaining power in Karachi. With the help of state power and military backing MQM is still more active and effective in carrying out terrorism! Tr. Altaf Hussain's main achievements are as follows:

1. Creating division among Muslims of Pakistan. He and his MQM raised slogans against Sindhi, Punjabi and Pathans of Pakistan and insulted them public ally
2. MQM killed poor Rickshaw drivers, small vendors, laborers
3. MQM killed Hakeem Saeed, Syed Slahuddin (on orders of Aga Khan), and many Quranic scholars in day light
4. MQM created torture centers where they drilled living human beings with electric drill machines. One such example is the son of Mr. Abdur Rehman Siddiqui, councilor of Block 10, Federal B Area Karachi, and his son was abducted on 1st Ramadan by MQM activists and the dead body was found after Iftar. When the father gave bath to the dead body of his beloved son he found numerous electric drill holes all over body. I knew personally Abdur Rehman who is very humble, polite and helpful friendly person. There are numerous other murders like these have been created by MQM
5. MQM killed political opponents and even its own party members including its General secretary Tariq Azim
6. MQM killed potentially rival personalities including Aslam Mujahid who was considered to be the next candidate for Nazim of Karachi
7. MQM created a wave of hatred among Muslims while Tr. Altaf had good and cordial relations with the leaders of other anti Islam and anti Pakistan political organizations. He never spoke a single word against Ta'ghoot Tr. Aga Khan and his Fidayeen terrorists.
8. MQM activists had been fully sponsored by CIA, KGB, Moosad and RAW. The American consulate in Karachi issued visas to America on recommendations of MQM and hence a great number of their activists moved to USA and Canada
9. MQM had created a culture of corruption, vulgarity, cheapness, death and destruction in Pakistan. It ridiculed Great Poet Iqbal and promoted rotten, foul smelling Jahilia culture which is strictly prohibited by the Prophet (PBUH)
10. MQM rigged elections, killed innocent people sitting in the polling stations, took away the ballot boxes and later declared itself winner. In the last by- elections MQM killed several people in Karachi in this fashion. Even Justice Irsahd Hussain declared those elections null and void but Musharraf sent Irshad on leave, appointed another temporary Election Commissioner and declared terrorists as winner and members of National Assembly. MQM fired on the people attending the funeral prayers of those killed. My own brother and his sons were among the people who attended the funeral prayers, which were held close to their home.
11. MQM agents act as mercenaries and paid killers and they are on pay role of secret agencies like CIA and Mossad etc.

Types of Real Terrorists:

Following are some types of Real Terrorists:

1) Players of physical violence against innocent civilians as witnessed in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hands of Bush, Blair and Israeli Government and in Chechnya by Puttin and in Kashmir by Indian Government. In the past they dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and ignited World War I and II and now III. They drop Napalm bombs, daisy cutters and silver bullets (Uranium bullets) and use microbes e.g. Dengue Fever virus carrying mosquitoes etc. Their terrorism and gross violation of human rights can be seen through Abu Gharib jail and Guantanamo prisons where prisoners are tortured day and night without trials and some prisoners are killed giving their day light murder by Bush as suicides

2) Monetary terrorism which makes middle class poor and poor class poorer. Interest in various forms is their tool and this is the precise reason that Allah Ta’lah had prohibited interest in its all forms. And this was the reason that the Zionists of that time, tried to kill Jesus (PBUH) because he was opposing Interest and usury. The main players of this worst type of terrorism are International Monetary Funds (IMF) and World Bank. The former always ask for rising prices in every country on the most basic commodities e.g. water, fuel gas, petrol, wheat, sugar, oil etc. The World Bank and its siblings and progeny always ignite wars in order to sell the outdated arms and generate new weapons of mass destruction. As there is growing awareness about these organizations and there is strong public resentment against them, they keep changing the names e.g. Paris Club, Asian Development Bank etc. The fact is that there is hardly any contribution toward real human progress but there is progress in shear materialism, greed and destruction of moral, ethical, family, social values.

3) UNO is one of the biggest tool of World Global Terrorists. UNO would legitimize the aggression of the terrorists on small countries e.g. Bush and Blair attack on Iraq. UNO also servers as controlling the countries on behalf of the Zionists. In order to impart the good name and to hide its Zionist terrorist character it has created World Health Organization (WHO) which also consumes a large amount of AIDS and wastes it on many unfounded and ill conceived projects. In the 8^th October 2005 earthquake WHO masters stole drugs which were donated for poor victims and consumed a large sum of money.

4) Medical terrorism which creates all sorts of scares and Halloween dramas e.g. Bird Flu, Anthrax, SARS and other dramas to keep people in constant fear so they are not focused on real and genuine problems and may not look at real terrorists . WHO also plays key role in spread of these pseudo threats!

5) Media terrorism which has stolen the eyes, ears and minds of most Americans, Europeans and many other Non-Muslims. It has played a key role on war on Islam. I would like to present here an excellent article by Abid Ullah Jan here:

“Who says it's not a war on Islam?

by Abid Ullah Jan - Weekly Nida-e-Khilafat

It is painful to watch old news-reels of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini making speeches and crowds cheering. Mussolini's posturing seems so transparent that one wonders how adults could have taken him seriously. With Hitler, what comes across is crude, passionate intensity and the rapture of his audiences, sharing his feelings, with minds turned off. What is chilling is knowing how many tens of millions of human beings lost their lives because of these almost musical-comedy performances. The seemingly shallow stuff can have deep roots as well as deep consequences. Few things today are shallower than the reasons most people have for supporting Bush and Blair war on "terrorism" and accepting their claims that it is not a war on Islam. To understand if it is a war on Islam, we need to honestly and impartially scan the horizon since 1990.

Apart from the massive air strikes, commando raids and a prolonged "dirty war" against Islamic movements, the police repression, deportation, torture, censorship and death squads that we are certainly going to face are certainly not planned after the September 11 attacks. The US "war on terror" is no more than translation to the physical level, of the systematic approach that started with

(1) introduction of the rancid notion of "Islamic fundamentalism,"
(2) classification of Islam;
(3) equating "fundamentalism" with extremism and then terrorism;
(4) removal of governments, like Mr. Erbakan in Turkey, for having affiliations with Islam
(5) support of governments' cracking down on "Islamic extremists" such as Egyptian and Algerian regimes;
(6) development of agendas for government's like Musharraf;
(7) initially supporting the Taliban and then demonizing them to show the world the failure of Islam.

The coming physical horror is simply execution of the judgments passed by the western intellectuals upon Islam in the past decade or so.

Just have a look at how the ground has been prepared for the coming "dirty war." Musharraf came to "moderate" religious schools and take Jihad related Quranic verses from school curricula in 2001. However, the Economist sensed "The Islamic Threat" way back in its March 13, 1993 edition whereby it declared: "It is the mightiest power in the Levant...Governments tremble before it. Arabs everywhere turn to it for salvation from their various miseries. This power is not Egypt, Iraq, or indeed any nation, but the humble mosque." Mosques would probably be the next targets after dealing with Madrassah. Similarly, since the establishment of Israel, no one had talked about "fundamentalism," yet Yitzhak Rabin suddenly started calling the world in December 1992, "to devote its attention to the greater danger inherent in Islamic fundamentalism. [W]e stand on the line of fire against the danger of fundamentalist Islam."

Mr. Bush with a slip of tongue tells his mind in 2001 by describing the US recent missions in the lands of Islam as "crusade." Peter Rodman, senior editor of the National Review, however, saw in 1992 that the West being challenged from the outside by a "militant, atavistic force driven by a hatred of all Western political thought, harking back to age-old grievances against Christendom....the rage against us is too great..." (May 11, 1992). Charles Krauthammer summed up the expected resistance by the Islamic civilization to the hegemonic designs of the US in one word: "Global Intifada," (Washington Post January 1, 1993). He tried to suggest that the world is now "facing a mood and a movement...a perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judaeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both." The New York Times went one step ahead and confirmed on January 21st, 1996: "The Red Menace Is Gone. But Here's Islam." The open war against it, however, had to be delayed until a perfect excuse like the September 11 attacks.

Intellectuals like Samuel P. Huntington played a key role in making Islam an enemy of choice. He declared: "Islam is the only civilization which has put the survival of the West in doubt." Web page of the Montclair State University in New Jersey reads: "The West today is losing irretrievably its former global hegemony and is increasingly challenged economically and culturally by East Asian and Islamic civilizations." Irving Kristol, Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in the Wall Street Journal, editorial August 2, 1996: "With the end of the Cold War, what we really need is an obvious ideological and threatening enemy, one worthy of our mettle, one that can unite us in opposition."

Bernard Lewis In his influential essay, "The Roots of Muslim Rage," writes: "Islamic fundamentalism has given an aim and a form to the otherwise aimless and formless resentment and anger of the Muslim masses" (Atlantic, September 99). Islamic "fundamentalism," according to Amos Perlmutter (Insight in the News, February 15, 1993), is "a plague" which has infected the entire Islamic world and whose goal is to topple secularist military regimes in Egypt, Syria and Algeria and replace them with [unacceptable] Islamic states."

Daily Express, ran an article "Islam Is a Creed of Cruelty" on January 16, 1995, which concluded that the specter of Islamic fundamentalism was haunting Europe and the world power should enter into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter. The underlying assumption has always been that Islam is primitive, underdeveloped, retrograde, at best stuck in the memory hole of a medieval splendor out of which it could not disentangle itself without a radical transformation; and this could only be based on Western, "rational", "progressive" values. The long proposed "holy alliance" is now in making.

A above mentioned examples show that during the past 11-12 years systematic efforts have been directed to relegated Islam from its holistic perspective, encompassing all facets of human conduct and behavior to a mere set or rituals, something what the west has done to Christianity itself. According to Lt-Col Trinka of US Army, "[Muslims] must work to fashion the shariah into a modern blue print for change." In a similar vein, one of the CIA experts counseled that those Muslims who do not believe that world of God is law, should be found and supported. "The Arab rulers," he thinks, "have to create a new identity of [Muslim] seductively fusing Islam and the West."

This so-called expert added: "Though the Saudi rulers may be guilty of ugly authoritarian behavior and consistent stupidity in foreign affairs, they are at least fervent hypocrites, and that [in] Middle East Affairs, a fervent hypocrite is always safer than a fervent puritan." He had the audacity to make such humiliating remark because there was truth in it. These are in fact general policy guidelines that we see in operation during lifting of democracy related sanctions against Pakistan and visit of the British Prime Minister who could not bear an undemocratic government in Pakistan at any cost.

Over the last decade the western propaganda successfully divided Muslim into "Moderates," "Liberals" and "Fundamentalists" for whom there is no basis or justification in Islam. There has been no definition offered even in the Western propaganda. Salman Rushdie, however, lists in his October 2, article in Washington Post what he believes fundamentalists are against: "homosexuals, pluralism, secularism, short skirts, dancing, evolution theory, sex." He believes such "fundamentalists are tyrants, not Muslims...yes, even the short skirts and dancing -- are worth dying for." He further argues, "kissing in public places, bacon sandwiches, cutting-edge fashion, movies, music, freedom of thought, beauty, love," should matter
and "these will be our weapons." The moderates among us should decide for themselves as to what kind of Islam allows kissing in public places, bacon sandwiches, homosexuality, etc.

Besides mass propaganda, efforts were underway to support Hosnie Mubarak like regimes for their crackdown on Islamic opposition and remove Erbakan like elected governments for exactly the same reasons for which the US wants to support religious groups in China. With false propaganda, the Taliban have been demonized to the extent that even majority of the Muslims who have never set a foot on the Afghan soil to verify the grand lies, speak in the anti-Taliban, CNNised language. The US has established that a country can never be ruled with Islamic principles. Now the war is only left to be carried out by individual Muslim countries by collecting information on its citizens as to who is involved with the banned religious parties, who is the extremist, how to arrest and try the fundamentalism and if necessary remove them from the scene.

Apart from the above-mentioned factors, the US, UK recent moves are part of an undeclared war on Islam because:

1. Jonathan Steele, Ewen MacAskill, Richard Norton-Taylor and Ed Harriman reported on September 22, 2001 in the Guardian that attacks on Afghanistan were planned before September 11. The US planned the attacks as soon as it considered it's demonizing the Taliban project as complete.

2. Islam is the only challenge to American hegemony with its claims to be a complete code of life with panacea for ills in economic, political, moral and spiritual systems, and thus only Islam can pose a threat to the civilization considered superior by the West.

3. The West reasons that the source of terrorism is not its terrorism but Islamic teachings and history. Naturally, the real campaign is against the teachings of Islam from the original sources at Madrassah. Mustafa Kamal destroyed Islamic teachings 85 years ago in Turkey and dried up the swamp. We however are expected to follow the suit sooner than later.

4. The US is planning to impose its brand of democracy or autocracy - whichever may be suitable -- on Muslim countries by force. The US put forward many symbolic personalities over the years to undermine the roots of Islam. These advocates preach unconditional assimilation into, support of, sympathy toward, and whole-hearted participation in the social and political system espoused by the US.

5. Transmissions of BBC and CNN testify to the fact that it is a war on Islam. On their part they put forward unqualified individuals or groups as representatives of Islam who may be unethical, deviants, or outright heretics from the religion with no subjective measures being used to ascertain the qualifications of such people. Rushdie's recent article in the Washington Post is an excellent example. They present Islamic Shariah as antiquated, irrelevant, authoritarian, unsophisticated, and limited.

6. By making public statements like: Taliban are not the real Muslims, the American leaders, like Karl Inderfurth, have long been creating a nationalistic or ethnic view and approach to Islam, or more accurately, creating a new religion that cannot truly be called Islam but rather has some outward aspects of it. It will certainly be one that would not pose a challenge to the US domination or offer anything that will make Islam seen as a viable alternative to the US uni-polar world.

7. The evidence suggests that it is the US government that has been playing a leading role in the media crusade against Islam. As early as fall 1994, PBS aired a documentary by journalist Steve Emerson Titled "Jihad in America." Evidence within the program suggests that Emerson has access to official government intelligence. Some clips appear to be from home videos confiscated from Muslims in FBI sweeps. A decade of this kind of programming has set the climate for a war on Islam.

The facts do not change with the denials of Bush and Blair. The strength of Islam lies in the fact that despite having far less military and economic power, the western war-makers do not have the courage to declare it an open war on Islam. They would certainly fail as long as they want to cover their ulterior motives and undermine Islam under the guise of looking for "infinite Justice." Ending terrorism through eradicating its root causes may not take more than a few months. However, defeating Islam may cost them many generations before finally realizing that it was a wrong war.”

Media also promotes vulgarity, pornography, superstitions like horoscopes, greed and materialism and a lot of confusion. The Satan and its agents find media a very suitable and rewarding way to make humans their slaves and harm them from multiple routes and sources. Print media, TV, Radio and Film all have played their role in degrading human beings to far below animal level and in dishonoring woman by making her a tool of entertainment for the chauvinist and macho men. Hence the war on Islam also includes the war on Hijab and modesty.

6) Secret agencies like Free Masson, Rotary Club, Lions Club and many sects and organizations play key role in destruction of the society through helping each other in all wrongs. Sects like Qadyanis, Bahis and Ismailis etc through their leaders may play role in terrorism of some sort. It is not necessary that all of their followers are bad but their blind worship to their leaders and their organization tantamount to be taking them God and thus without questioning they cooperate in and with the policies and practices of the Global Terrorists.

7) Schools, Curriculum and Text Books etc. also waste a lot of precious time of young students though teaching them wrong and useless education which kills their originality and creativity. !000 years back Ibn-e-Sina at the age of 18 would become the World’s renowned researchers and doctor of medicine with masterpiece text books on medicine and pharmacology which would be Standard Text Book of Medicine in European colleges for 600 years. The terror of memorization useless garbage has resulted in failure of many bright students’ entry to the professional colleges. As a matter of fact many school and college dropped outs had done far better than the ones who adopted total slavery of imposed rigid curriculum. In those countries where education is imparted in languages other than their native language had created class system based on inferiority complexes and had led to deprivation of the world form many talented and genius people simply because they could not communicate in English. Iqbal has pointed out destructive role of Schools in destroying the very basic human freedom of thought and creativity in his several poems.

8) Courts and Prisons are other forms of real terrorists. Courts at times instead of providing justice and upholding constitution and law actually help terrorism by legitimizing the worst dictators and constitution and law breakers. The prime example is Musharraf. While all the judges who did not took oath on his dictatorship were sent home by force while those who opted to become his obedient servants in all wrongs were retained. Interestingly Musharraf then uses the verdicts of these bought up judges as a proof of his innocence and his righteousness! Similarly prisons are the worst terror cells. In Islam there is no concept of prison at all. Releasing people form prisons is a great and pious act of reward. Man is free and no body has right to send him behind the bar. If he does any crime punish him effectively, swiftly and appropriately according to the laws of the God and not through man made laws. Man can not become the god of man! It is as simple as that. The prisons punish the innocent the most. These could be relatives e.g. mother, children and spouses of the person in prison. Years of agony, anxiety, depression and frustration are imparted on these people and many of those who have not committed any crime. Instead of justice being cheap and easily and quickly available which the essence of Islamic system is, the “justice” is available to those who can buy it. Poor Salamah who had no role in world trade enter bombing in 1993 is still behind the bars, while the real culprit Josie Hadas has been sent free to Israel! Islam’s quick, rapid, free justice is the most effective way of containing and diminishing and eliminating crimes. This is the reason the world terrorists do not like Islamic laws .

9) Governmental Roles, Rules and Regulations are another form of terrorism in many countries. First the world has been divided in many countries thorough artificial lines and then man is prevented from freely traveling and seeking job etc. Too many and too much restrictions are created which actually caused too much problems. Then instead of helping the travelers (again an other distinguishing feature of Islam), the Governments have assumed illegal power. They want to peep in your belonging and even collect money on your hard earned income. This is a gross violation of human rights but generally people are totally helpless. Similarly Governments collect taxes to present this blood to their Zionist masters on silver plate and this is the reason why IMF etc. are always asking for raising taxes. The Governments take loans on behalf of the people while people are not taken in confidence. While these loans (So called AIDS) are planned wasted, they are passed on to the poor people to pay along with ten times compound interest.

10) Drug Mafia: Drugs are behind 9/11! Talibans had deprived the world form 60% of world heroin which led the underground drug mafia to convulsions. Islam prohibits all narcotics and mind corrupters while Zionist control most drug mafia and do not care about common people. They would money even if destroy other people whom they regard “Talking Animals” in their religious book Talmud (Of course not Torah which is their real divine book from the God, but which they hide) or Gentile meaning bastard in Hebrew. Other drugs include alcohol and cigarettes which are bringing a great misery to the human beings in so many different ways. They have gross destructive effects on economy, health, social and environment. As the Zionists control these products, it is understandable that their puppets and salesmen like Bush and Blair will go to great extent and even create wars to make sure smooth supply of these hard drugs. As a result the heroin supply is fully restored from Afghanistan. Poor young people are dying due to addiction but the Zionists terrorists and their most obedient servants and slaves are getting fatter and fatter day by day.

11) It would not be an exaggeration to say that Israel and Zionists are the patrons of terrorism in all its shapes and forms all over the world

In the end we would like to present the following cartoon which describes the entire story in few lines and words!